Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 350
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 350 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH Steiger 350 vs Challenger 85C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 85C
Crawler
- power
- 355 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 350
vs
ChallengerChallenger 85C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 85C higher · +5 hp (+1%)Steiger 350350 hp
85C355 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
Steiger 350 is in the 41st percentile; 85C is in the 42nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 85C higher · +98 ci (+18%)Steiger 350531 ci
85C629 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
Steiger 350 is in the 12th percentile; 85C is in the 21st · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 3506
85C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
Steiger 350 is in the 50th percentile; 85C is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ Steiger 350 higher · +6 (+60%)Steiger 35016
85C10
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
Steiger 350 is in the 50th percentile; 85C is in the 11th · 146 models
Steiger 350 (A)85C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 350 | 85C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3176 ATAAC | — |
| Power Output | 350hp | 355hp | ▲ 85C+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 85C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 531ci | 629ci | ▲ 85C+98 ci · +18% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,848lb | 33,645lb | ▲ Steiger 350+2,203 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 350 | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 20gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 41st percentile (350 hp)B · 42nd percentile (355 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 12th percentile (531 ci)B · 21st percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 11th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 45th percentile (35,848 lb)B · 40th percentile (33,645 lb)
A · Steiger 350B · 85CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor