Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 396 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1038 vs Challenger MT565B MFWD
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT565B MFWD
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1038
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 1038 higher · +355 ci (+88%)1038758 ci
MT565B MFWD403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1038 is in the 96th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 68th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10386
MT565B MFWD6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1038 is in the 74th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1038 higher · +15,515 lb (+96%)103831,615 lb
MT565B MFWD16,100 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1038 is in the 95th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 74th · 971 models
Width
▲ 1038 higher · +26.4 in (+32%)1038108 in
MT565B MFWD81.6 in
Median Agricultural Tractor79.5 in
1038 is in the 91st percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 54th · 497 models
1038 (A)MT565B MFWD (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 1038 | MT565B MFWD | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 396hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT565B MFWD+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 403ci | ▲ 1038+355 ci · +88% |
| Bore | 5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 108in | 81.6in | ▲ 1038+26.4 in · +32% |
| Height | 136in | 124in | ▲ 1038+12 in · +10% |
| Wheelbase | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 16,100lb | ▲ 1038+15,515 lb · +96% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensing | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type IV | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 14,284lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24V) | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.8gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 68th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 74th percentile (16,100 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 91st percentile (108 in)B · 54th percentile (81.6 in)
Height
median 111 inA · 94th percentile (136 in)B · 82nd percentile (124 in)
A · 1038B · MT565B MFWDMedian Agricultural Tractor