Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs Yanmar LX490
YanmarModel B
Yanmar LX490
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48.5 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
YanmarYanmar LX490
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1042 higher · +362 hp (+745%)1042410 hp
LX49048.5 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1042 higher · +636 ci (+521%)1042758 ci
LX490122 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 1042 higher · +2 (+50%)10426
LX4904
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
1042 is in the 50th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1042 higher · +27,997 lb (+774%)104231,615 lb
LX4903,618 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
1042 is in the 35th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 132 models
1042 (A)LX490 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1042 | LX490 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 48.5hp | ▲ 1042+362 hp · +745% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ LX490+900 RPM · +53% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1042+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 758ci | 122ci | ▲ 1042+636 ci · +521% |
| Bore | 5in | 3.5in | ▲ 1042+1.5 in · +43% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 1042+2.9 in · +81% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 124in | ▲ 1042+118 in · +95% |
| Width | Not recorded | 83.4in | — |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 3,618lb | ▲ 1042+27,997 lb · +774% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Open center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | IV | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,760lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 1st percentile (48.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 1st percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 1st percentile (3,618 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 17th percentile (242 in)B · 1st percentile (124 in)
A · 1042B · LX490Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor