ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65
Crawler
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 65 vs Challenger MT565B MFWD
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT565B MFWD
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 65 higher · +235 ci (+58%)65638 ci
MT565B MFWD403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
65 is in the 94th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 68th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied656
MT565B MFWD6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
65 is in the 74th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65 higher · +17,100 lb (+106%)6533,200 lb
MT565B MFWD16,100 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
65 is in the 96th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 74th · 971 models
Width
▲ 65 higher · +31.4 in (+38%)65113 in
MT565B MFWD81.6 in
Median Agricultural Tractor79.5 in
65 is in the 93rd percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 54th · 497 models
65 (A)MT565B MFWD (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65 | MT565B MFWD | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 270hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT565B MFWD+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 403ci | ▲ 65+235 ci · +58% |
| Bore | 4.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 225in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 113in | 81.6in | ▲ 65+31.4 in · +38% |
| Height | 127in | 124in | ▲ 65+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 33,200lb | 16,100lb | ▲ 65+17,100 lb · +106% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 14,284lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 6.8gal | ▲ 65+4.2 gal · +62% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 94th percentile (638 ci)B · 68th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 96th percentile (33,200 lb)B · 74th percentile (16,100 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 93rd percentile (113 in)B · 54th percentile (81.6 in)
Height
median 111 inA · 85th percentile (127 in)B · 82nd percentile (124 in)
A · 65B · MT565B MFWDMedian Agricultural Tractor