ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65E
Articulated
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 65E vs Challenger MT740
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT740
Articulated
- power
- 345 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT740
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT740 higher · +35 hp (+11%)65E310 hp
MT740345 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
65E is in the 9th percentile; MT740 is in the 17th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65E higher · +30 ci (+5%)65E629 ci
MT740599 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
65E is in the 13th percentile; MT740 is in the 6th · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT740 higher · +1 (+17%)65E6
MT7407
Median Articulated Tractor6
65E is in the 50th percentile; MT740 is in the 92nd · 61 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT740 higher · +1,695 lb (+5%)65E34,195 lb
MT74035,890 lb
Median Articulated Tractor51,335 lb
65E is in the 9th percentile; MT740 is in the 18th · 57 models
65E (A)MT740 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65E | MT740 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 345hp | ▲ MT740+35 hp · +11% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 65E+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT740+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 629ci | 599ci | ▲ 65E+30 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 65E+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.7in | ▲ MT740+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | CVT, Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 25in | 88in | ▲ MT740+63 in · +252% |
| Operating Weight | 34,195lb | 35,890lb | ▲ MT740+1,695 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | 12 volt | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 9th percentile (310 hp)B · 17th percentile (345 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 6th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 92nd percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 9th percentile (34,195 lb)B · 18th percentile (35,890 lb)
Width
median 100 inA · 1st percentile (25 in)B · 42nd percentile (88 in)
A · 65EB · MT740Median Articulated Tractor