ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75C vs Challenger MT740
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT740
Articulated
- power
- 345 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 75C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT740
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT740 higher · +20 hp (+6%)75C325 hp
MT740345 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75C is in the 13th percentile; MT740 is in the 17th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75C higher · +30 ci (+5%)75C629 ci
MT740599 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75C is in the 13th percentile; MT740 is in the 6th · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT740 higher · +1 (+17%)75C6
MT7407
Median Articulated Tractor6
75C is in the 50th percentile; MT740 is in the 92nd · 61 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT740 higher · +2,585 lb (+8%)75C33,305 lb
MT74035,890 lb
Median Articulated Tractor51,335 lb
75C is in the 8th percentile; MT740 is in the 18th · 57 models
75C (A)MT740 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75C | MT740 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 345hp | ▲ MT740+20 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 75C+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT740+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 629ci | 599ci | ▲ 75C+30 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 75C+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.7in | ▲ MT740+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | CVT, Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | 88in | ▲ 75C+32 in · +36% |
| Height | 144in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,305lb | 35,890lb | ▲ MT740+2,585 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear 1000 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 17th percentile (345 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 6th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 92nd percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 8th percentile (33,305 lb)B · 18th percentile (35,890 lb)
Width
median 100 inA · 72nd percentile (120 in)B · 42nd percentile (88 in)
A · 75CB · MT740Median Articulated Tractor