ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT845
Articulated
- power
- 380 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT845 vs John Deere 9460RT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9460RT
Crawler
- power
- 460 hp
- displacement
- 827 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT845
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9460RT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 9460RT higher · +80 hp (+21%)MT845380 hp
9460RT460 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT845 is in the 29th percentile; 9460RT is in the 55th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9460RT higher · +98 ci (+13%)MT845729 ci
9460RT827 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT845 is in the 20th percentile; 9460RT is in the 49th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT8456
9460RT6
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT845 is in the 50th percentile; 9460RT is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9460RT higher · +2 (+13%)MT84516
9460RT18
Median Articulated Tractor16
MT845 is in the 50th percentile; 9460RT is in the 97th · 59 models
MT845 (A)9460RT (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT845 | 9460RT | — |
| Category | Articulated | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | C12 | PowerTech PSX | — |
| Power Output | 380hp | 460hp | ▲ 9460RT+80 hp · +21% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | 827ci | ▲ 9460RT+98 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 5.2in | ▲ 9460RT+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 6.5in | ▲ 9460RT+0.6 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | 237in | ▲ MT845+29 in · +12% |
| Width | 142in | 136in | ▲ MT845+6 in · +4% |
| Height | 138in | 134in | ▲ MT845+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 40,000lb | 47,020lb | ▲ 9460RT+7,020 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 4N/4 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Hydraulic wet disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 14.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT845 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 29th percentile (380 hp)B · 55th percentile (460 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 20th percentile (729 ci)B · 49th percentile (827 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 97th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 20th percentile (40,000 lb)B · 38th percentile (47,020 lb)
A · MT845B · 9460RTMedian Articulated Tractor