ChallengerModel A
Challenger 85C
Crawler
- power
- 355 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 85C vs Claas Xerion 5000
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 5000
Utility
- power
- 487 hp
- displacement
- 763 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 85C
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 5000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ Xerion 5000 higher · +132 hp (+37%)85C355 hp
Xerion 5000487 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
85C is in the 72nd percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 85th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Xerion 5000 higher · +134 ci (+21%)85C629 ci
Xerion 5000763 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
85C is in the 67th percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 76th · 191 models
Operating Weight
▲ 85C higher · +4,105 lb (+14%)85C33,645 lb
Xerion 500029,540 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
85C is in the 70th percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 65th · 173 models
Length
▲ Xerion 5000 higher · +63 in (+27%)85C232 in
Xerion 5000295 in
Median Crawler Tractor146 in
85C is in the 83rd percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 98th · 144 models
85C (A)Xerion 5000 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | 85C | Xerion 5000 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | C13 | — |
| Power Output | 355hp | 487hp | ▲ Xerion 5000+132 hp · +37% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 85C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 629ci | 763ci | ▲ Xerion 5000+134 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 295in | ▲ Xerion 5000+63 in · +27% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,645lb | 29,540lb | ▲ 85C+4,105 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Four-Wheel Steering | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 31.5x38 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 31.5x38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 4N | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Four-Wheel Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 72nd percentile (355 hp)B · 85th percentile (487 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 67th percentile (629 ci)B · 76th percentile (763 ci)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 70th percentile (33,645 lb)B · 65th percentile (29,540 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 98th percentile (295 in)
A · 85CB · Xerion 5000Median Crawler Tractor