ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT565B MFWD
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT565B MFWD
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 75E higher · +226 ci (+56%)75E629 ci
MT565B MFWD403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 68th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75E6
MT565B MFWD6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 75E higher · +18,700 lb (+116%)75E34,800 lb
MT565B MFWD16,100 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
75E is in the 97th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 74th · 971 models
Width
▲ MT565B MFWD higher · +56.6 in (+226%)75E25 in
MT565B MFWD81.6 in
Median Agricultural Tractor79.5 in
75E is in the 1st percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 54th · 497 models
75E (A)MT565B MFWD (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75E | MT565B MFWD | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT565B MFWD+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 403ci | ▲ 75E+226 ci · +56% |
| Bore | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 25in | 81.6in | ▲ MT565B MFWD+56.6 in · +226% |
| Height | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 16,100lb | ▲ 75E+18,700 lb · +116% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 14,284lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 6.8gal | ▲ 75E+8.2 gal · +121% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 68th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 74th percentile (16,100 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 1st percentile (25 in)B · 54th percentile (81.6 in)
A · 75EB · MT565B MFWDMedian Agricultural Tractor