Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger 95E vs Challenger MT743

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 95E

Agricultural

power
410 hp
displacement
729 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 95E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT743

Crawler

power
425 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
7
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT743 specs
ChallengerChallenger 95E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT743

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT743 higher · +15 hp (+4%)
95E410 hp
MT743425 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

95E is in the 97th percentile; MT743 is in the 98th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 95E higher · +130 ci (+22%)
95E729 ci
MT743599 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

95E is in the 95th percentile; MT743 is in the 92nd · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT743 higher · +1 (+17%)
95E6
MT7437
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

95E is in the 74th percentile; MT743 is in the 98th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT743 higher · +700 lb (+2%)
95E35,520 lb
MT74336,220 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

95E is in the 97th percentile; MT743 is in the 97th · 971 models

95E (A)MT743 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model95EMT743—
CategoryAgriculturalCrawler, Agricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO Power—
ModelNot recordedAGCO Power 9.8 L—
Power Output410hp425hp▲ MT743+15 hp · +4%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,700RPM▲ 95E+400 RPM · +24%
Cylinders67▲ MT743+1 · +17%
Displacement729ci599ci▲ 95E+130 ci · +22%
Bore5.1in4.4in▲ 95E+0.7 in · +16%
Stroke5.9in5.7in▲ 95E+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
TypeFull power shiftCVT. Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
Width25in88in▲ MT743+63 in · +252%
Operating Weight35,520lb36,220lb▲ MT743+700 lb · +2%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
System TypeClosed centerLoad sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic differential steeringPower—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
Power RatingNot recorded377hp—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedCategory III/IVN—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded19,000lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
Chassis TypeCrawlerCrawlerSame
Drive TypeTracksTracksSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic differential steeringPower—
Brake TypeHydraulic caliper discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
Coolant20galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT743Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 97th percentile (410 hp)B · 98th percentile (425 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 95th percentile (729 ci)B · 92nd percentile (599 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 97th percentile (36,220 lb)

Width

median 79.5 in
A · 1st percentile (25 in)B · 63rd percentile (88 in)
A · 95EB · MT743Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 95EFull spec pageChallenger MT743