Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT255

Challenger MT225 Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225

Utility

power
23.3 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT255 higher · +5.1 hp (+22%)
MT22523.3 hp
MT25528.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT225 is in the 13th percentile; MT255 is in the 20th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT255 higher · +20.8 ci (+30%)
MT22568.5 ci
MT25589.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT255 is in the 15th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2253
MT2553
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT255 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT255 higher · +576 lb (+34%)
MT2251,672 lb
MT2552,248 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT255 is in the 14th · 5,107 models

MT225 (A)MT255 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225MT255—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
Power Output23.3hp28.4hp▲ MT255+5.1 hp · +22%
Rated RPM2,800RPM2,500RPM▲ MT225+300 RPM · +12%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci89.3ci▲ MT255+20.8 ci · +30%
Bore3.1in3.4in▲ MT255+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.1in3.3in▲ MT255+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
TypeHydrostaticConstant mesh—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
Length105in117in▲ MT255+12 in · +11%
Width41in51in▲ MT255+10 in · +24%
Height75.2in79.3in▲ MT255+4.1 in · +5%
Operating Weight1,672lb2,248lb▲ MT255+576 lb · +34%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePower steeringPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
Hitch TypeCategory ICAT I—
Hitch Category1I—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity694lb1,323lb▲ MT255+629 lb · +91%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePower steeringPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
Starter TypeElectric StarterElectric—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255Difference
TypeOpenOpen, ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 13th percentile (23.3 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 12th percentile (105 in)B · 23rd percentile (117 in)
A · MT225B · MT255Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225Full spec pageChallenger MT255