ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT225
Utility
- power
- 23.3 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT265
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT265
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT265 higher · +9.7 hp (+42%)MT22523.3 hp
MT26533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT225 is in the 13th percentile; MT265 is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT265 higher · +22.9 ci (+33%)MT22568.5 ci
MT26591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT265 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2253
MT2653
Median Utility Tractor4
MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT265 higher · +1,369 lb (+82%)MT2251,672 lb
MT2653,041 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models
MT225 (A)MT265 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT225 | MT265 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Power Output | 23.3hp | 33hp | ▲ MT265+9.7 hp · +42% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ MT225+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 91.4ci | ▲ MT265+22.9 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.4in | ▲ MT265+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.3in | ▲ MT265+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 105in | 122in | ▲ MT265+17 in · +16% |
| Width | 41in | 60.6in | ▲ MT265+19.6 in · +48% |
| Height | 75.2in | 93.2in | ▲ MT265+18 in · +24% |
| Operating Weight | 1,672lb | 3,041lb | ▲ MT265+1,369 lb · +82% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category I | Same |
| Hitch Category | 1 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 694lb | 2,100lb | ▲ MT265+1,406 lb · +203% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 13th percentile (23.3 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (105 in)B · 29th percentile (122 in)
A · MT225B · MT265Median Utility Tractor