Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT265B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT265B

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full MT265B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT265B higher · +4.6 hp (+16%)
MT25528.4 hp
MT265B33 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255 is in the 20th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT265B higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)
MT25589.3 ci
MT265B91.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255 is in the 15th percentile; MT265B is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2553
MT265B3
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT255 higher · +1 (+13%)
MT2559
MT265B8
Median Utility Tractor12

MT255 is in the 35th percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 4,941 models

MT255 (A)MT265B (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT255MT265B—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelNot recordedE3CD-VB40—
Power Output28.4hp33hp▲ MT265B+4.6 hp · +16%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,600RPM▲ MT265B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement89.3ci91.4ci▲ MT265B+2.1 ci · +2%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
TypeConstant meshSynchroShuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
Length117in121in▲ MT265B+4 in · +3%
Width51in62.2in▲ MT265B+11.2 in · +22%
Height79.3in87.4in▲ MT265B+8.1 in · +10%
Operating Weight2,248lb3,136lb▲ MT265B+888 lb · +40%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
Hitch TypeCAT ICategory I—
Hitch CategoryI1—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity1,323lb2,535lb▲ MT265B+1,212 lb · +92%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WDFour Wheel Drive (4WD)—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
CoolantNot recorded1.8gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265BDifference
TypeOpen, ROPSOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 35th percentile (9)B · 23rd percentile (8)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)
A · MT255B · MT265BMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255Full spec pageChallenger MT265B