Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255B vs Challenger MT265

Challenger MT255B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255B

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT255B specs
Challenger MT265 Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT265

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full MT265 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT265 higher · +4.6 hp (+16%)
MT255B28.4 hp
MT26533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255B is in the 20th percentile; MT265 is in the 25th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT265 higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)
MT255B89.3 ci
MT26591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT265 is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT255B3
MT2653
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255B is in the 23rd percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT265 higher · +618 lb (+26%)
MT255B2,423 lb
MT2653,041 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models

MT255B (A)MT265 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT255BMT265—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3CFNot recorded—
Power Output28.4hp33hp▲ MT265+4.6 hp · +16%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,600RPM▲ MT265+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement89.3ci91.4ci▲ MT265+2.1 ci · +2%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
TypeHydrostaticPower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
Length112in122in▲ MT265+10 in · +9%
Width50.6in60.6in▲ MT265+10 in · +20%
Height80.7in93.2in▲ MT265+12.5 in · +15%
Operating Weight2,423lb3,041lb▲ MT265+618 lb · +26%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
Hitch Type3 Point HitchCategory I—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity1,609lb2,100lb▲ MT265+491 lb · +31%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
Coolant1.5galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT265Difference
TypeOpenNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 29th percentile (122 in)
A · MT255BB · MT265Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255BFull spec pageChallenger MT265