Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255B vs Challenger MT335

Challenger MT255B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255B

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT255B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT335

Sub-Compact

power
33 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT335 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT335

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 5,383–5,383

Engine Power

▲ MT335 higher · +4.6 hp (+16%)
MT255B28.4 hp
MT33533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255B is in the 20th percentile; MT335 is in the 25th · 5,383 models

MT255B (A)MT335 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT255BMT335—
CategoryUtilitySub-Compact—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
ManufacturerIsekiMitsubishi—
ModelE3CFNot recorded—
Power Output28.4hp33hp▲ MT335+4.6 hp · +16%
Rated RPM2,500RPMNot recorded—
Cylinders3Not recorded—
Displacement89.3ciNot recorded—
Bore3.4inNot recorded—
Stroke3.3inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
TypeHydrostaticManual—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
Length112inNot recorded—
Width50.6inNot recorded—
Height80.7inNot recorded—
Operating Weight2,423lbNot recorded—

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
System TypeOpen CenterNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
Hitch Type3 Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch Capacity1,609lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
Coolant1.5galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT335Difference
TypeOpenNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
A · MT255BB · MT335Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255BFull spec pageChallenger MT335