ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT495D
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT495D vs Challenger MT535B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535B
Utility
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT495D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT495D higher · +4 hp (+3%)MT495D150 hp
MT535B146 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; MT535B is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT535B higher · +103 ci (+34%)MT495D299 ci
MT535B402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT495D is in the 84th percentile; MT535B is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535B higher · +2 (+50%)MT495D4
MT535B6
Median Utility Tractor4
MT495D is in the 50th percentile; MT535B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT495D higher · +985 lb (+7%)MT495D15,765 lb
MT535B14,780 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; MT535B is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
MT495D (A)MT535B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT495D | MT535B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Perkins | — |
| Model | 49AWI | Perkins Diesel, Serial No. U004188P | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 146hp | ▲ MT495D+4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT535B+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 402ci | ▲ MT535B+103 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ MT495D+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ MT495D+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AutoPower VI / Techstar CVT | Continuously variable transmission (AGCO CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 169in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 107in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 14,780lb | ▲ MT495D+985 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 31.4gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,930psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | front wheel assist | 4x4 articulated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated by two-foot pedals | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.7gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (150 hp)B · 93rd percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (299 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,765 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,780 lb)
A · MT495DB · MT535BMedian Utility Tractor