Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT765C vs Challenger MT835

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT835

Agricultural

power
340 hp
displacement
729 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT835 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT835 higher · +19 hp (+6%)
MT765C321 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT765C is in the 95th percentile; MT835 is in the 96th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT835 higher · +192 ci (+36%)
MT765C537 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT765C is in the 89th percentile; MT835 is in the 95th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT765C6
MT8356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT765C is in the 74th percentile; MT835 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT765C16
MT83516
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT765C is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 972 models

MT765C (A)MT835 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT765CMT835—
CategoryCrawler, AgriculturalAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC9 ACERTC12—
Power Output321hp340hp▲ MT835+19 hp · +6%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci729ci▲ MT835+192 ci · +36%
Bore4.4in5.1in▲ MT835+0.7 in · +16%
Stroke5.9in5.9inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
Type16-Speed Full Power ShiftFull Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
Length233in266in▲ MT835+33 in · +14%
Width133in142in▲ MT835+9 in · +7%
Height136in139in▲ MT835+3 in · +2%
Operating Weight31,085lb40,000lb▲ MT835+8,915 lb · +29%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center Load Sensing—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedType IVN—
Hitch CategoryCategory III/IIINNot recorded—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic Wet DiscHydraulic Wet DiscSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT765CChallenger MT835Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 95th percentile (321 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 95th percentile (729 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 95th percentile (31,085 lb)B · 97th percentile (40,000 lb)
A · MT765CB · MT835Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT765CFull spec pageChallenger MT835