Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT865C vs Challenger MT975C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT865C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
534 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT865C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
585 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT975C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT865C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 71–162

Engine Power

▲ MT975C higher · +51 hp (+10%)
MT865C534 hp
MT975C585 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT865C is in the 83rd percentile; MT975C is in the 88th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT865C1,105 ci
MT975C1,105 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT865C is in the 91st percentile; MT975C is in the 91st · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT865C6
MT975C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT865C is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT865C16
MT975C16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT865C is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 146 models

MT865C (A)MT975C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT865CMT975C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC18 ACERTC18 ACERTSame
Power Output534hp585hp▲ MT975C+51 hp · +10%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement1,105ci1,105ciSame
Bore5.7in5.7inSame
Stroke7.2in7.2inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
TypeCaterpillar PowershiftCaterpillar Powershift, full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
Length270in298in▲ MT975C+28 in · +10%
Width142in200in▲ MT975C+58 in · +41%
Height138in151in▲ MT975C+13 in · +9%
Operating Weight43,125lb50,535lb▲ MT975C+7,410 lb · +17%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedDirect engine drive—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
Hitch CategoryIII/IVNNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedalNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975CDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 83rd percentile (534 hp)B · 88th percentile (585 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 68th percentile (43,125 lb)B · 89th percentile (50,535 lb)
A · MT865CB · MT975CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT865CFull spec pageChallenger MT975C