FarmallModel A
Farmall F-30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 284 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Farmall F-30 vs Twin City KT
Twin CityModel B
Twin City KT
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 284 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
FarmallFarmall F-30
vs
Twin CityTwin City KT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedF-30284 ci
KT284 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
F-30 is in the 83rd percentile; KT is in the 83rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedF-304
KT4
Median Utility Tractor4
F-30 is in the 50th percentile; KT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F-30 higher · +1 (+33%)F-304
KT3
Median Utility Tractor12
F-30 is in the 4th percentile; KT is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ F-30 higher · +1,000 lb (+23%)F-305,300 lb
KT4,300 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
F-30 is in the 50th percentile; KT is in the 41st · 5,107 models
F-30 (A)KT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Twin City | — |
| Model | F-30 | KT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Minneapolis | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,150RPM | 1,000RPM | ▲ F-30+150 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 284ci | 284ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized Gear | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 147in | 131in | ▲ F-30+16 in · +12% |
| Width | 90in | 59in | ▲ F-30+31 in · +53% |
| Height | 81in | 64.5in | ▲ F-30+16.5 in · +26% |
| Operating Weight | 5,300lb | 4,300lb | ▲ F-30+1,000 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Hand-crank | Hand-crank | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall F-30 | Twin City KT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9gal | 6gal | ▲ F-30+3 gal · +50% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (284 ci)B · 83rd percentile (284 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,300 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,300 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 63rd percentile (147 in)B · 42nd percentile (131 in)
A · F-30B · KTMedian Utility Tractor