Image not recorded
FarmallModel A
Farmall Super BM
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 264 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall Super BM vs Twin City MTA
Image not recorded
Twin CityModel B
Twin City MTA
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 284 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
FarmallFarmall Super BM
vs
Twin CityTwin City MTA
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ MTA higher · +20 ci (+8%)Super BM264 ci
MTA284 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Super BM is in the 19th percentile; MTA is in the 29th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSuper BM4
MTA4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Super BM is in the 17th percentile; MTA is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Super BM higher · +2 (+67%)Super BM5
MTA3
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Super BM is in the 7th percentile; MTA is in the 1st · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ Super BM higher · +440 lb (+9%)Super BM5,300 lb
MTA4,860 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Super BM is in the 9th percentile; MTA is in the 7th · 1,350 models
Super BM (A)MTA (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Twin City | — |
| Model | Super BM | MTA | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Not recorded | KE | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,150RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 264ci | 284ci | ▲ MTA+20 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.3in | ▲ MTA+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ Super BM+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 143in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 64.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,300lb | 4,860lb | ▲ Super BM+440 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Tires
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.50x16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.00x36 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall Super BM | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 19th percentile (264 ci)B · 29th percentile (284 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 7th percentile (5)B · 1st percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 9th percentile (5,300 lb)B · 7th percentile (4,860 lb)
A · Super BMB · MTAMedian Row Crop Tractor