Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1120 vs Ford 1200
Image not recorded
FordFord 1120
vs
FordFord 1200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1120 higher · +3.7 hp (+23%)112019.7 hp
120016 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1120 is in the 8th percentile; 1200 is in the 4th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1120 higher · +4.5 ci (+9%)112053.6 ci
120049.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1120 is in the 3rd percentile; 1200 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1120 higher · +1 (+50%)11203
12002
Median Utility Tractor4
1120 is in the 23rd percentile; 1200 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1200 higher · +1 (+11%)11209
120010
Median Utility Tractor12
1120 is in the 35th percentile; 1200 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
1120 (A)1200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1120 | 1200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | S723 | LEK802D | — |
| Power Output | 19.7hp | 16hp | ▲ 1120+3.7 hp · +23% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ 1200+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 1120+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 53.6ci | 49.1ci | ▲ 1120+4.5 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 2.8in | 3.2in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.2in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type | Gear shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 94.9in | ▲ 1120+11.1 in · +12% |
| Width | 40.9in | 42.2in | ▲ 1200+1.3 in · +3% |
| Height | 80.1in | 79in | ▲ 1120+1.1 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 1,338lb | 1,344lb | ▲ 1200+6 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Live | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Rear, transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,410lb | 881lb | ▲ 1120+529 lb · +60% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Expanding shoe | Differential mechanical drum | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | 1.1gal | ▲ 1200+0.2 gal · +22% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 1200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (19.7 hp)B · 4th percentile (16 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (53.6 ci)B · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,338 lb)B · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)
A · 1120B · 1200Median Utility Tractor