Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Kubota B1550 HST
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota B1550 HST
Utility
- power
- 17 hp
- displacement
- 52.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1200
vs
KubotaKubota B1550 HST
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ B1550 HST higher · +1 hp (+6%)120016 hp
B1550 HST17 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1200 is in the 4th percentile; B1550 HST is in the 5th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ B1550 HST higher · +3.1 ci (+6%)120049.1 ci
B1550 HST52.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; B1550 HST is in the 3rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ B1550 HST higher · +1 (+50%)12002
B1550 HST3
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; B1550 HST is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ B1550 HST higher · +34 lb (+3%)12001,344 lb
B1550 HST1,378 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1200 is in the 4th percentile; B1550 HST is in the 4th · 5,107 models
1200 (A)B1550 HST (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 1200 | B1550 HST | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Kubota | — |
| Model | LEK802D | D850-5B | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | 17hp | ▲ B1550 HST+1 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ B1550 HST+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 52.2ci | ▲ B1550 HST+3.1 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Hydrostatic (HST) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 101in | ▲ B1550 HST+6.1 in · +6% |
| Width | 42.2in | 43.3in | ▲ B1550 HST+1.1 in · +3% |
| Height | 79in | 74.8in | ▲ 1200+4.2 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 1,378lb | ▲ B1550 HST+34 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 858rpm | — |
| Speed 3 | Not recorded | 2,416rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 827lb | ▲ 1200+54 lb · +7% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Internal-expanding | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | 0.8gal | ▲ 1200+0.3 gal · +38% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B1550 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 4th percentile (16 hp)B · 5th percentile (17 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 3rd percentile (52.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 4th percentile (1,378 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 6th percentile (94.9 in)B · 9th percentile (101 in)
A · 1200B · B1550 HSTMedian Utility Tractor