Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Shibaura 1210
ShibauraModel B
Shibaura 1210
Utility
- power
- 16 hp
- displacement
- 53.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 10
FordFord 1200
vs
ShibauraShibaura 1210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied120016 hp
121016 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 1210 is in the 4th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1210 higher · +4.5 ci (+9%)120049.1 ci
121053.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; 1210 is in the 3rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1210 higher · +1 (+50%)12002
12103
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; 1210 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied120010
121010
Median Utility Tractor12
1200 is in the 39th percentile; 1210 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
1200 (A)1210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Shibaura | — |
| Model | 1200 | 1210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | LEK802D | S723 | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | 16hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,700RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 1210+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 53.6ci | ▲ 1210+4.5 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Gear shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 101in | ▲ 1210+6.1 in · +6% |
| Width | 42.2in | 43.3in | ▲ 1210+1.1 in · +3% |
| Height | 79in | 50.4in | ▲ 1200+28.6 in · +57% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 1,329lb | ▲ 1200+15 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Rear | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-point hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 881lb | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Differential mechanical drum | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | 0.6gal | ▲ 1200+0.5 gal · +83% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS (open) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 4th percentile (16 hp)B · 4th percentile (16 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 3rd percentile (53.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,329 lb)
A · 1200B · 1210Median Utility Tractor