Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Ford 5610 Mark III
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 5610 Mark III
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 256 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 1200
vs
FordFord 5610 Mark III
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +207 ci (+421%)120049.1 ci
5610 Mark III256 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +2 (+100%)12002
5610 Mark III4
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +6 (+60%)120010
5610 Mark III16
Median Utility Tractor12
1200 is in the 39th percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +5,936 lb (+442%)12001,344 lb
5610 Mark III7,280 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 69th · 5,107 models
1200 (A)5610 Mark III (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1200 | 5610 Mark III | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | LEK802D | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,070RPM | ▲ 1200+630 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ 5610 Mark III+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 256ci | ▲ 5610 Mark III+207 ci · +421% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 4.4in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+1.3 in · +42% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4.2in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+1.1 in · +35% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Dual Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 145in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+50.1 in · +53% |
| Width | 42.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 79in | 110in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+31 in · +39% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 7,280lb | ▲ 5610 Mark III+5,936 lb · +442% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open center with closed-center valves | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 73rd percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,280 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 6th percentile (94.9 in)B · 61st percentile (145 in)
A · 1200B · 5610 Mark IIIMedian Utility Tractor