Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Ford 6530
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 6530
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 20
FordFord 1200
vs
FordFord 6530
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 6530 higher · +189 ci (+385%)120049.1 ci
6530238 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; 6530 is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 6530 higher · +2 (+100%)12002
65304
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; 6530 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6530 higher · +10 (+100%)120010
653020
Median Utility Tractor12
1200 is in the 39th percentile; 6530 is in the 86th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 6530 higher · +4,456 lb (+332%)12001,344 lb
65305,800 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 6530 is in the 55th · 5,107 models
1200 (A)6530 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1200 | 6530 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Fiat | — |
| Model | LEK802D | 8045.05 | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 1200+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ 6530+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 238ci | ▲ 6530+189 ci · +385% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 4.1in | ▲ 6530+1 in · +32% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4.5in | ▲ 6530+1.4 in · +45% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Partially synchronized / Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 162in | ▲ 6530+67.1 in · +71% |
| Width | 42.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 79in | 109in | ▲ 6530+30 in · +38% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 5,800lb | ▲ 6530+4,456 lb · +332% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 65th percentile (238 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 86th percentile (20)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 55th percentile (5,800 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 6th percentile (94.9 in)B · 78th percentile (162 in)
A · 1200B · 6530Median Utility Tractor