Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs John Deere 4010

John DeereModel B
John Deere 4010
Utility
- power
- 18.5 hp
- displacement
- 47.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1200
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 4010
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 4010 higher · +2.5 hp (+16%)120016 hp
401018.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 4010 is in the 7th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1200 higher · +1.3 ci (+3%)120049.1 ci
401047.8 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; 4010 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 4010 higher · +1 (+50%)12002
40103
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; 4010 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 4010 higher · +76 lb (+6%)12001,344 lb
40101,420 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 4010 is in the 4th · 5,107 models
1200 (A)4010 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | 1200 | 4010 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | LEK802D | 3TNE68 | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | 18.5hp | ▲ 4010+2.5 hp · +16% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ 4010+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 4010+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 47.8ci | ▲ 1200+1.3 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 2.7in | ▲ 1200+0.4 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 102in | ▲ 4010+7.1 in · +7% |
| Width | 42.2in | 44.5in | ▲ 4010+2.3 in · +5% |
| Height | 79in | 78.3in | ▲ 1200+0.7 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 1,420lb | ▲ 4010+76 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-point hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 860lb | ▲ 1200+21 lb · +2% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | 0.6gal | ▲ 1200+0.5 gal · +83% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | John Deere 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 4th percentile (16 hp)B · 7th percentile (18.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 2nd percentile (47.8 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 4th percentile (1,420 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 6th percentile (94.9 in)B · 10th percentile (102 in)
A · 1200B · 4010Median Utility Tractor