Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 1620
Utility
- power
- 27.4 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1620 vs Ford 9N
FordFord 1620
vs
FordFord 9N
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1620 higher · +2.3 hp (+9%)162027.4 hp
9N25.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1620 is in the 19th percentile; 9N is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9N higher · +38.8 ci (+48%)162081.2 ci
9N120 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1620 is in the 13th percentile; 9N is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9N higher · +1 (+33%)16203
9N4
Median Utility Tractor4
1620 is in the 23rd percentile; 9N is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9N higher · +1,343 lb (+60%)16202,233 lb
9N3,576 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1620 is in the 14th percentile; 9N is in the 30th · 5,107 models
1620 (A)9N (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1620 | 9N | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 27.4hp | 25.1hp | ▲ 1620+2.3 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,001RPM | ▲ 1620+599 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 9N+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 120ci | ▲ 9N+38.8 ci · +48% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.2in | ▲ 1620+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.8in | ▲ 9N+0.7 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 115in | ▲ 9N+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 48.4in | 64in | ▲ 9N+15.6 in · +32% |
| Height | 84.3in | 52in | ▲ 1620+32.3 in · +62% |
| Operating Weight | 2,233lb | 3,576lb | ▲ 9N+1,343 lb · +60% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 558rpm | ▲ 9N+18 rpm · +3% |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 4.00x19 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 10.00x28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,930lb | 798lb | ▲ 1620+1,132 lb · +142% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Differential mechanical shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 28th percentile (120 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)B · 30th percentile (3,576 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · 1620B · 9NMedian Utility Tractor