Head to head · Utility
Ford 1900 vs Mitsubishi MT28
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT28
Utility
- power
- 27.6 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 1900
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT28
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1900 higher · +2.4 hp (+9%)190030 hp
MT2827.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1900 is in the 22nd percentile; MT28 is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1900 higher · +6.8 ci (+8%)190087.2 ci
MT2880.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1900 is in the 15th percentile; MT28 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied19003
MT283
Median Utility Tractor4
1900 is in the 23rd percentile; MT28 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1900 higher · +4 (+50%)190012
MT288
Median Utility Tractor12
1900 is in the 50th percentile; MT28 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
1900 (A)MT28 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 1900 | MT28 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | LEM853 | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 30hp | 27.6hp | ▲ 1900+2.4 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1900+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 87.2ci | 80.4ci | ▲ 1900+6.8 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.1in | ▲ 1900+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.6in | ▲ MT28+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 126in | ▲ MT28+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 57.7in | 55.1in | ▲ 1900+2.6 in · +5% |
| Height | 86.3in | 93.9in | ▲ MT28+7.6 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 2,689lb | 2,579lb | ▲ 1900+110 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type: I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 22nd percentile (30 hp)B · 20th percentile (27.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (87.2 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 19th percentile (2,689 lb)B · 18th percentile (2,579 lb)
A · 1900B · MT28Median Utility Tractor