Image not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Lanz 100 vs Lanz 200

LanzLanz 100
vs
LanzLanz 200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 200 higher · +7 hp (+39%)10018 hp
20025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
100 is in the 18th percentile; 200 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 200 higher · +10.3 ci (+14%)10072.1 ci
20082.4 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
100 is in the 35th percentile; 200 is in the 43rd · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1002
2002
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
100 is in the 11th percentile; 200 is in the 11th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied1006
2006
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
100 is in the 18th percentile; 200 is in the 18th · 616 models
100 (A)200 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Lanz | Lanz | Same |
| Model | 100 | 200 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | John Deere | Same |
| Power Output | 18hp | 25hp | ▲ 200+7 hp · +39% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 72.1ci | 82.4ci | ▲ 200+10.3 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.9in | ▲ 200+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 60in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 56.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,750lb | 3,255lb | ▲ 200+505 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540/1000 (Rear), 1000 (Mid) | 540/1000 | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | 1,000rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Lanz 100 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.7gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 18th percentile (18 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 35th percentile (72.1 ci)B · 43rd percentile (82.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 18th percentile (6)B · 18th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 51st percentile (2,750 lb)B · 61st percentile (3,255 lb)
A · 100B · 200Median Sub-Compact Tractor