McCormick-DeeringModel A
McCormick-Deering W-30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 284 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Utility
McCormick-Deering W-30 vs Minneapolis-Moline UTU
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline UTU
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 284 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering W-30
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline UTU
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedW-30284 ci
UTU284 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
W-30 is in the 83rd percentile; UTU is in the 83rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedW-304
UTU4
Median Utility Tractor4
W-30 is in the 50th percentile; UTU is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ UTU higher · +2 (+67%)W-303
UTU5
Median Utility Tractor12
W-30 is in the 3rd percentile; UTU is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ UTU higher · +650 lb (+13%)W-304,850 lb
UTU5,500 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
W-30 is in the 46th percentile; UTU is in the 51st · 5,107 models
W-30 (A)UTU (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick-Deering W-30 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick-Deering | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | W-30 | UTU | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick-Deering W-30 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,150RPM | 1,275RPM | ▲ UTU+125 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 284ci | 284ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick-Deering W-30 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick-Deering W-30 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 140in | ▲ UTU+18 in · +15% |
| Width | 66.3in | 84.5in | ▲ UTU+18.2 in · +27% |
| Height | 60in | 70.5in | ▲ UTU+10.5 in · +18% |
| Operating Weight | 4,850lb | 5,500lb | ▲ UTU+650 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick-Deering W-30 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick-Deering W-30 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Capacities
| Spec | McCormick-Deering W-30 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 6gal | ▲ W-30+5 gal · +83% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (284 ci)B · 83rd percentile (284 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 3rd percentile (3)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 46th percentile (4,850 lb)B · 51st percentile (5,500 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 30th percentile (122 in)B · 54th percentile (140 in)
A · W-30B · UTUMedian Utility Tractor