Head to head · Sub-Compact

Mitsubishi MT305 vs Mitsubishi MT365

Mitsubishi MT305 Tractor
MitsubishiModel A

Mitsubishi MT305

Sub-Compact

power
30 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT305 specs
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B

Mitsubishi MT365

Sub-Compact

power
36 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT365 specs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT305
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT365

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 616–816

Engine Power

▲ MT365 higher · +6 hp (+20%)
MT30530 hp
MT36536 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

MT305 is in the 57th percentile; MT365 is in the 68th · 816 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT30516
MT36516
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9

MT305 is in the 89th percentile; MT365 is in the 89th · 616 models

MT305 (A)MT365 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecMitsubishi MT305Mitsubishi MT365Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiMitsubishiSame
ModelMT305MT365—
CategorySub-CompactSub-CompactSame

Engine

SpecMitsubishi MT305Mitsubishi MT365Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiMitsubishiSame
ModelNot recordedMT365—
Power Output30hp36hp▲ MT365+6 hp · +20%

Electrical

SpecMitsubishi MT305Mitsubishi MT365Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 57th percentile (30 hp)B · 68th percentile (36 hp)

Forward Gears

median 9
A · 89th percentile (16)B · 89th percentile (16)
A · MT305B · MT365Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageMitsubishi MT305Full spec pageMitsubishi MT365