Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Steiger 3300 vs Woods & Copeland 301C

Image not recorded
SteigerModel A

Steiger 3300

Four-Wheel Drive

power
318 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
8
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 3300 specs
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B

Woods & Copeland 301C

Articulated

power
301 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 301C specs
SteigerSteiger 3300
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 301C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 162162

Engine Power

▲ 3300 higher · +17 hp (+6%)
3300318 hp
301C301 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

3300 is in the 31st percentile; 301C is in the 27th · 162 models

3300 (A)301C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecSteiger 3300Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerSteigerWoods & Copeland
Model3300301C
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveArticulated

Engine

SpecSteiger 3300Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerDetroit DieselCaterpillar
Model8V91NNot recorded
Power Output318hp301hp3300+17 hp · +6%
Rated RPM2,300RPMNot recorded
Cylinders8Not recorded

Hitch & Towing

SpecSteiger 3300Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
Hitch CategoryCategory 3III

Chassis & Drive

SpecSteiger 3300Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
Chassis Type4x4 4WD4x4 articulated
Drive Type4WD4WDSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 31st percentile (318 hp)B · 27th percentile (301 hp)
A · 3300B · 301CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageSteiger 3300Full spec pageWoods & Copeland 301C