Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Steiger 800 Tiger vs Woods & Copeland 301C

Image not recorded
SteigerModel A

Steiger 800 Tiger

Four-Wheel Drive

power
300 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
8
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 800 Tiger specs
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B

Woods & Copeland 301C

Articulated

power
301 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 301C specs
SteigerSteiger 800 Tiger
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 301C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 162–162

Engine Power

▲ 301C higher · +1 hp (<1%)
800 Tiger300 hp
301C301 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

800 Tiger is in the 26th percentile; 301C is in the 27th · 162 models

800 Tiger (A)301C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerSteigerWoods & Copeland—
Model800 Tiger301C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveArticulated—

Engine

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerCumminsCaterpillar—
Power Output300hp301hp▲ 301C+1 hp · <1%
Cylinders8Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 301CDifference
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame

Chassis & Drive

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 301CDifference
Chassis Type4x4 4WD4x4 articulated—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 26th percentile (300 hp)B · 27th percentile (301 hp)
A · 800 TigerB · 301CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageSteiger 800 TigerFull spec pageWoods & Copeland 301C