Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Steiger CA-325 vs Woods & Copeland 301C

Image not recorded
SteigerModel A

Steiger CA-325

Four-Wheel Drive

power
325 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full CA-325 specs
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B

Woods & Copeland 301C

Articulated

power
301 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 301C specs
SteigerSteiger CA-325
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 301C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 162–162

Engine Power

▲ CA-325 higher · +24 hp (+8%)
CA-325325 hp
301C301 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

CA-325 is in the 35th percentile; 301C is in the 27th · 162 models

CA-325 (A)301C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecSteiger CA-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerSteigerWoods & Copeland—
ModelCA-325301C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveArticulated—

Engine

SpecSteiger CA-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
Power Output325hp301hp▲ CA-325+24 hp · +8%
Cylinders6Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecSteiger CA-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
Hitch CategoryCategory 3III—

Chassis & Drive

SpecSteiger CA-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
Chassis Type4x4 4WD4x4 articulated—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 35th percentile (325 hp)B · 27th percentile (301 hp)
A · CA-325B · 301CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageSteiger CA-325Full spec pageWoods & Copeland 301C