Head to head · Utility

Steiger CU-325 vs Woods & Copeland 301C

Image not recorded
SteigerModel A

Steiger CU-325

Utility

power
325 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full CU-325 specs
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B

Woods & Copeland 301C

Articulated

power
301 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 301C specs
SteigerSteiger CU-325
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 301C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 5,383–5,383

Engine Power

▲ CU-325 higher · +24 hp (+8%)
CU-325325 hp
301C301 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

CU-325 is in the 97th percentile; 301C is in the 97th · 5,383 models

CU-325 (A)301C (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerSteigerWoods & Copeland—
ModelCU-325301C—
CategoryUtility, Four-Wheel DriveArticulated—

Engine

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
ManufacturerCumminsCaterpillar—
Power Output325hp301hp▲ CU-325+24 hp · +8%
Cylinders6Not recorded—

Transmission

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
TypeClosedNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
Hitch Category3III—

Chassis & Drive

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 301CDifference
Chassis Type4x44x4 articulated—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 97th percentile (325 hp)B · 97th percentile (301 hp)
A · CU-325B · 301CMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageSteiger CU-325Full spec pageWoods & Copeland 301C