Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 160 vs CaseIH Puma 170

CaseIHCaseIH Puma 160
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 170 higher · +7 hp (+4%)
Puma 160160 hp
Puma 170167 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 160 is in the 62nd percentile; Puma 170 is in the 66th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 160411 ci
Puma 170411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 160 is in the 60th percentile; Puma 170 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1606
Puma 1706
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 160 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 170 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Puma 16018
Puma 17018
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 160 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 170 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Puma 160 (A)Puma 170 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
ModelPuma 160Puma 170—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
ManufacturerFPTFPTSame
Power Output160hp167hp▲ Puma 170+7 hp · +4%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Width61.4inNot recorded—
Operating Weight16,360lb18,740lb▲ Puma 170+2,380 lb · +15%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC)Same
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Hitch TypeNot recorded2/3N—
Hitch Category2/3NNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4 Wheel Drive (4WD)—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 170Difference
StandardInterim Tier 4Not recorded—
Control Systemselective catalytic reduction (SCR)SCR—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 62nd percentile (160 hp)B · 66th percentile (167 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 71st percentile (16,360 lb)B · 81st percentile (18,740 lb)
A · Puma 160B · Puma 170Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 160Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 170