Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 240 vs Challenger MT575E

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 240

Row Crop

power
240 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 240 specs
Challenger MT575E Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT575E

Agricultural

power
240 hp
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT575E specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT575E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,206–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 240240 hp
MT575E240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; MT575E is in the 86th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT575E higher · +38 ci (+9%)
Puma 240411 ci
MT575E449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; MT575E is in the 77th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2406
MT575E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; MT575E is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Puma 240 (A)MT575E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelPuma 240MT575E—
CategoryRow CropAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
ManufacturerFPTAGCO Power—
Power Output240hp240hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Puma 240+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci449ci▲ MT575E+38 ci · +9%
Bore4.1in4.3in▲ MT575E+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.2in5.3in▲ MT575E+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
TypeFull power shiftCVT—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
Operating Weight16,800lbNot recorded—

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
System TypeOpen center pressure flow compensatingClosed-center load sensing—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchIII/IIIN—
Hitch Category3Not recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT575EDifference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
A · Puma 240B · MT575EMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 240Full spec pageChallenger MT575E