Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

CaseIH STX325 vs Challenger MT765

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH STX325

Four-Wheel Drive

power
325 hp
displacement
540 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full STX325 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765

Agricultural

power
299 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765 specs
CaseIHCaseIH STX325
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ STX325 higher · +26 hp (+9%)
STX325325 hp
MT765299 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

STX325 is in the 35th percentile; MT765 is in the 25th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ STX325 higher · +3 ci (<1%)
STX325540 ci
MT765537 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

STX325 is in the 14th percentile; MT765 is in the 13th · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
STX3256
MT7656
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

STX325 is in the 50th percentile; MT765 is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
STX32516
MT76516
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

STX325 is in the 50th percentile; MT765 is in the 50th · 146 models

STX325 (A)MT765 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelSTX325MT765—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
ManufacturerCDCCaterpillar—
Model6TAA-9004Not recorded—
Power Output325hp299hp▲ STX325+26 hp · +9%
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,100RPM▲ MT765+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement540ci537ci▲ STX325+3 ci · <1%
Bore4.5in4.4in▲ STX325+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.9in▲ MT765+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
TypeFull Power Shift / Fully SynchronizedSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
Length296inNot recorded—
Width36.5inNot recorded—
Height145inNot recorded—
Operating Weight31,925lb29,345lb▲ STX325+2,580 lb · +9%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
System TypePressure Flow Compensated (PFC)Not recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
Type1000 (1.75)Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
Hitch CategoryIVN/IIIIII—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet multiple disc, hydraulically actuated by foot pedal—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH STX325Challenger MT765Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 35th percentile (325 hp)B · 25th percentile (299 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 14th percentile (540 ci)B · 13th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 36th percentile (31,925 lb)B · 28th percentile (29,345 lb)
A · STX325B · MT765Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH STX325Full spec pageChallenger MT765