Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT765
Agricultural
- power
- 299 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT765 vs New Holland TJ325
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TJ325
Row Crop
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 540 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT765
vs
New HollandNew Holland TJ325
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ TJ325 higher · +26 hp (+9%)MT765299 hp
TJ325325 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT765 is in the 93rd percentile; TJ325 is in the 95th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TJ325 higher · +3 ci (<1%)MT765537 ci
TJ325540 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT765 is in the 89th percentile; TJ325 is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT7656
TJ3256
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT765 is in the 74th percentile; TJ325 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ TJ325 higher · +8 (+50%)MT76516
TJ32524
Median Agricultural Tractor16
MT765 is in the 50th percentile; TJ325 is in the 81st · 972 models
MT765 (A)TJ325 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT765 | TJ325 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | CDC | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 6TAA-9004 | — |
| Power Output | 299hp | 325hp | ▲ TJ325+26 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ MT765+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 540ci | ▲ TJ325+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ TJ325+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ MT765+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | Full powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 296in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 145in | — |
| Operating Weight | 29,345lb | 31,925lb | ▲ TJ325+2,580 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | New Holland TJ325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 12.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (299 hp)B · 95th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 89th percentile (540 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 81st percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 94th percentile (29,345 lb)B · 96th percentile (31,925 lb)
A · MT765B · TJ325Median Agricultural Tractor