Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT755C vs Challenger MT765

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT755C

Agricultural

power
301 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT755C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765

Agricultural

power
299 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT755C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 971–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT755C higher · +2 hp (<1%)
MT755C301 hp
MT765299 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT755C is in the 94th percentile; MT765 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT755C537 ci
MT765537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT755C is in the 89th percentile; MT765 is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT755C6
MT7656
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT755C is in the 74th percentile; MT765 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT755C16
MT76516
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT755C is in the 50th percentile; MT765 is in the 50th · 972 models

MT755C (A)MT765 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT755CMT765—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC9 ACERTNot recorded—
Power Output301hp299hp▲ MT755C+2 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci537ciSame
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.9in5.9inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
TypeFull power shiftSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
Length233inNot recorded—
Width133inNot recorded—
Height136inNot recorded—
Operating Weight30,195lb29,345lb▲ MT755C+850 lb · +3%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedNot recorded—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINIII—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discWet multiple disc, hydraulically actuated by foot pedal—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 94th percentile (301 hp)B · 93rd percentile (299 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 94th percentile (30,195 lb)B · 94th percentile (29,345 lb)
A · MT755CB · MT765Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT755CFull spec pageChallenger MT765