Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT765
Agricultural
- power
- 299 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT765 vs Claas Challenger 75E
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Challenger 75E
Crawler
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger MT765
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 75E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ Challenger 75E higher · +41 hp (+14%)MT765299 hp
Challenger 75E340 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT765 is in the 93rd percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 75E higher · +92 ci (+17%)MT765537 ci
Challenger 75E629 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT765 is in the 89th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 93rd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT7656
Challenger 75E6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT765 is in the 74th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT765 higher · +6 (+60%)MT76516
Challenger 75E10
Median Agricultural Tractor16
MT765 is in the 50th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 23rd · 972 models
MT765 (A)Challenger 75E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | MT765 | Challenger 75E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Power Output | 299hp | 340hp | ▲ Challenger 75E+41 hp · +14% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 629ci | ▲ Challenger 75E+92 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.9in | ▲ Challenger 75E+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.5in | ▲ MT765+0.4 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 29,345lb | 34,800lb | ▲ Challenger 75E+5,455 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | III,IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter (12 volts) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 15gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (299 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 93rd percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 94th percentile (29,345 lb)B · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)
A · MT765B · Challenger 75EMedian Agricultural Tractor