Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT765
Agricultural
- power
- 299 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT765 vs Fendt 933
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 933
Agricultural
- power
- 288 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT765
vs
FendtFendt 933
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT765 higher · +11 hp (+4%)MT765299 hp
933288 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT765 is in the 93rd percentile; 933 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 933 higher · +14 ci (+3%)MT765537 ci
933551 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT765 is in the 89th percentile; 933 is in the 91st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT7656
9336
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT765 is in the 74th percentile; 933 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT765 higher · +1,135 lb (+4%)MT76529,345 lb
93328,210 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT765 is in the 94th percentile; 933 is in the 93rd · 971 models
MT765 (A)933 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT765 | 933 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO GmbH Johann Georg Fendt | — |
| Power Output | 299hp | 288hp | ▲ MT765+11 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT765+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 551ci | ▲ 933+14 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 933+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ MT765+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 130in | — |
| Operating Weight | 29,345lb | 28,210lb | ▲ MT765+1,135 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT765 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (299 hp)B · 93rd percentile (288 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 91st percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 94th percentile (29,345 lb)B · 93rd percentile (28,210 lb)
A · MT765B · 933Median Agricultural Tractor