Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT265

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
Challenger MT265 Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT265

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full MT265 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT265 higher · +4.6 hp (+16%)
MT25528.4 hp
MT26533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255 is in the 20th percentile; MT265 is in the 25th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT265 higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)
MT25589.3 ci
MT26591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255 is in the 15th percentile; MT265 is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2553
MT2653
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT265 higher · +7 (+78%)
MT2559
MT26516
Median Utility Tractor12

MT255 is in the 35th percentile; MT265 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

MT255 (A)MT265 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT255MT265—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
Power Output28.4hp33hp▲ MT265+4.6 hp · +16%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,600RPM▲ MT265+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement89.3ci91.4ci▲ MT265+2.1 ci · +2%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
TypeConstant meshPower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
Length117in122in▲ MT265+5 in · +4%
Width51in60.6in▲ MT265+9.6 in · +19%
Height79.3in93.2in▲ MT265+13.9 in · +18%
Operating Weight2,248lb3,041lb▲ MT265+793 lb · +35%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
Hitch TypeCAT ICategory I—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity1,323lb2,100lb▲ MT265+777 lb · +59%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT265Difference
TypeOpen, ROPSNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 35th percentile (9)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)
A · MT255B · MT265Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255Full spec pageChallenger MT265