Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT335
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT335
Sub-Compact
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT335
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT335 higher · +4.6 hp (+16%)MT25528.4 hp
MT33533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT255 is in the 20th percentile; MT335 is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT335 higher · +7 (+78%)MT2559
MT33516
Median Utility Tractor12
MT255 is in the 35th percentile; MT335 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MT255 (A)MT335 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT255 | MT335 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 33hp | ▲ MT335+4.6 hp · +16% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 51in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 79.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,248lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | CAT I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,323lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · MT255B · MT335Median Utility Tractor