Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665E
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665E vs Challenger MT765
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765
Agricultural
- power
- 299 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT665E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT765 higher · +9 hp (+3%)MT665E290 hp
MT765299 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665E is in the 93rd percentile; MT765 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT765 higher · +24 ci (+5%)MT665E513 ci
MT765537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665E is in the 88th percentile; MT765 is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665E6
MT7656
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665E is in the 74th percentile; MT765 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT765 higher · +4,675 lb (+19%)MT665E24,670 lb
MT76529,345 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665E is in the 91st percentile; MT765 is in the 94th · 971 models
MT665E (A)MT765 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT665E | MT765 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 299hp | ▲ MT765+9 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 537ci | ▲ MT765+24 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.9in | ▲ MT765+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 219in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 141in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 24,670lb | 29,345lb | ▲ MT765+4,675 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 999rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,065rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 93rd percentile (299 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)B · 94th percentile (29,345 lb)
A · MT665EB · MT765Median Agricultural Tractor