Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT740
Articulated
- power
- 345 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT740 vs Challenger MT765B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765B
Articulated
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT740
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT740 higher · +24 hp (+7%)MT740345 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT740 is in the 17th percentile; MT765B is in the 10th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT740 higher · +62 ci (+12%)MT740599 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT740 is in the 6th percentile; MT765B is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT740 higher · +1 (+17%)MT7407
MT765B6
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT740 is in the 92nd percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 61 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT740 higher · +4,805 lb (+15%)MT74035,890 lb
MT765B31,085 lb
Median Articulated Tractor51,335 lb
MT740 is in the 18th percentile; MT765B is in the 4th · 57 models
MT740 (A)MT765B (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT740 | MT765B | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | — |
| Power Output | 345hp | 321hp | ▲ MT740+24 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT765B+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT740+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | 537ci | ▲ MT740+62 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.9in | ▲ MT765B+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT, Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | PowerShift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 233in | — |
| Width | 88in | 88in | Same |
| Height | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,890lb | 31,085lb | ▲ MT740+4,805 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load Sensing | Closed-center PFC | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IVN | Standard Cat.3/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 17,263lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volt | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT740 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 17th percentile (345 hp)B · 10th percentile (321 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 6th percentile (599 ci)B · 1st percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 92nd percentile (7)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 18th percentile (35,890 lb)B · 4th percentile (31,085 lb)
Width
median 100 inA · 42nd percentile (88 in)B · 42nd percentile (88 in)
A · MT740B · MT765BMedian Articulated Tractor