Head to head · Utility
Ford 1000 vs Ford 860
FordFord 1000
vs
FordFord 860
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 860 higher · +94.4 ci (+122%)100077.6 ci
860172 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1000 is in the 11th percentile; 860 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 860 higher · +2 (+100%)10002
8604
Median Utility Tractor4
1000 is in the 3rd percentile; 860 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1000 higher · +4 (+80%)10009
8605
Median Utility Tractor12
1000 is in the 35th percentile; 860 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 860 higher · +1,100 lb (+48%)10002,300 lb
8603,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1000 is in the 14th percentile; 860 is in the 28th · 5,107 models
1000 (A)860 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1000 | 860 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | LE892 | EAF | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1000+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ 860+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 77.6ci | 172ci | ▲ 860+94.4 ci · +122% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.9in | ▲ 860+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 1000+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | 122in | ▲ 860+21 in · +21% |
| Width | Not recorded | 64.6in | — |
| Height | 54.3in | 59.1in | ▲ 860+4.8 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 2,300lb | 3,400lb | ▲ 860+1,100 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 28-Dec | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-point | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,250lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Internal expanding shoes | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 860+2.4 gal · +171% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, Optional two-post ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)B · 46th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,300 lb)B · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 9th percentile (101 in)B · 30th percentile (122 in)
A · 1000B · 860Median Utility Tractor