Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Ford 860
FordFord 1200
vs
FordFord 860
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 860 higher · +123 ci (+250%)120049.1 ci
860172 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; 860 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 860 higher · +2 (+100%)12002
8604
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; 860 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1200 higher · +5 (+100%)120010
8605
Median Utility Tractor12
1200 is in the 39th percentile; 860 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 860 higher · +2,056 lb (+153%)12001,344 lb
8603,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 860 is in the 28th · 5,107 models
1200 (A)860 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1200 | 860 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | LEK802D | EAF | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1200+500 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ 860+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 172ci | ▲ 860+123 ci · +250% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3.9in | ▲ 860+0.8 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.6in | ▲ 860+0.5 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 122in | ▲ 860+27.1 in · +29% |
| Width | 42.2in | 64.6in | ▲ 860+22.4 in · +53% |
| Height | 79in | 59.1in | ▲ 1200+19.9 in · +34% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 3,400lb | ▲ 860+2,056 lb · +153% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 28-Dec | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-point | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 1,250lb | ▲ 860+369 lb · +42% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Internal expanding shoes | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 860+2.7 gal · +245% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 46th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 6th percentile (94.9 in)B · 30th percentile (122 in)
A · 1200B · 860Median Utility Tractor