Head to head · Utility
Ford 1900 vs Ford 640
Image not recorded
FordFord 1900
vs
FordFord 640
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 640 higher · +1 hp (+3%)190030 hp
64031 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1900 is in the 22nd percentile; 640 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 640 higher · +46.8 ci (+54%)190087.2 ci
640134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1900 is in the 15th percentile; 640 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 640 higher · +1 (+33%)19003
6404
Median Utility Tractor4
1900 is in the 23rd percentile; 640 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1900 higher · +8 (+200%)190012
6404
Median Utility Tractor12
1900 is in the 50th percentile; 640 is in the 4th · 4,941 models
1900 (A)640 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1900 | 640 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | LEM853 | EAE Red Tiger | — |
| Power Output | 30hp | 31hp | ▲ 640+1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 1900+800 RPM · +40% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 640+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 87.2ci | 134ci | ▲ 640+46.8 ci · +54% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.6in | ▲ 640+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 121in | ▲ 640+2 in · +2% |
| Width | 57.7in | 64.6in | ▲ 640+6.9 in · +12% |
| Height | 86.3in | 58.7in | ▲ 1900+27.6 in · +47% |
| Operating Weight | 2,689lb | 3,031lb | ▲ 640+342 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Conventional | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,250lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Internal expanding shoes operated by two foot pedals | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.8gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 640+2 gal · +111% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 22nd percentile (30 hp)B · 24th percentile (31 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (87.2 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 19th percentile (2,689 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,031 lb)
A · 1900B · 640Median Utility Tractor