Head to head · Articulated

Woods & Copeland 301C vs Woods & Copeland 320C

Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel A

Woods & Copeland 301C

Articulated

power
301 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 301C specs
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B

Woods & Copeland 320C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
320 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 320C specs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 301C
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 320C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated

n = 6262

Engine Power

▲ 320C higher · +19 hp (+6%)
301C301 hp
320C320 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp

301C is in the 7th percentile; 320C is in the 10th · 62 models

301C (A)320C (B)Median Articulated Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecWoods & Copeland 301CWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
ManufacturerWoods & CopelandWoods & CopelandSame
Model301C320C
CategoryArticulatedFour-Wheel Drive

Engine

SpecWoods & Copeland 301CWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCummins
Power Output301hp320hp320C+19 hp · +6%

Hitch & Towing

SpecWoods & Copeland 301CWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame

Chassis & Drive

SpecWoods & Copeland 301CWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated4x4 articulated 4WD
Drive Type4WD4WDSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 450 hp
A · 7th percentile (301 hp)B · 10th percentile (320 hp)
A · 301CB · 320CMedian Articulated Tractor
Full spec pageWoods & Copeland 301CFull spec pageWoods & Copeland 320C